Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 vs. Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4: A Comprehensive Showdown for Landscape Lovers

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases - a small commission at no extra cost to you. We greatly appreciate your support!

As a landscape photographer, capturing the breathtaking beauty of nature often hinges on the quality and capabilities of your lens. With an ever-growing array of wide-angle lenses in the market, finding the perfect partner for your camera can be a daunting task. In this riveting comparison, we’ll dive deep into the world of two highly-regarded contenders – the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 and the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4.

Designed for different camera systems, these lenses each boast a unique set of features and strengths that make them stand out in the crowd. But how do they fare when pitted against one another in the great outdoors? Will the mirrorless marvel, Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4, sweep us off our feet with its wider focal range and remarkable sharpness? Or will the DSLR darling, Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4, win our hearts with its consistent performance and superior distortion control?

Join us as we embark on an exhilarating journey, exploring every aspect of these two wide-angle warriors, from build quality and ergonomics to image quality and beyond.

By the end of this article, you’ll have a clear understanding of each lens’s strengths and weaknesses, empowering you to make the perfect choice for capturing stunning landscape images that leave a lasting impression.

So, grab your camera bags, and let’s dive into the ultimate showdown between the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 and the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4!

Overview

Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 SNikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR
Diameter x Length (mm)⌀89×85mm⌀82.5×125mm
Weight (gr)485680
Filter Thread (mm)8277
Weather SealingYesYes
Zoom MethodRotary (extending)Rotary (internal)
Distance ScaleNoYes
DoF ScaleNoYes
Hood SuppliedYesYes
Hood CodeHB-86HB-23

Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 has a wider focal range, starting at 14mm and going up to 30mm. This gives you a bit more flexibility when shooting landscapes, architecture, or even some interior shots. Its maximum aperture is f/4, which is the same as the other lens.

Now, it’s important to remember that this is a fixed aperture lens, meaning the aperture stays the same throughout the entire zoom range. This can be great for low light performance and consistent image quality.

It has a zoom ratio of 2.1x and uses the Nikon Z mount, which is designed for Nikon’s mirrorless cameras. So, if you have a Nikon mirrorless camera, this lens would be a great option for you.

Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 has a slightly narrower focal range, starting at 16mm and going up to 35mm. It also has a fixed aperture of f/4, giving you the same benefits as the first lens in terms of low light performance and image quality consistency.

This lens has a 2.2x zoom ratio and uses the Nikon F (FX) mount, which is meant for Nikon’s DSLR cameras. So, if you’re using a Nikon DSLR, this lens would be a better fit for you. But of course, it is also can be used on a Nikon mirrorless camera.

In summary, both lenses have their advantages. The Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 has a wider focal range and is designed for mirrorless cameras, while the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 offers a slightly longer zoom range and is built for DSLRs. Both have fixed apertures of f/4, providing good low light performance and consistent image quality.

Design and Ease of Use

Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 SNikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR
Diameter x Length (mm)⌀89×85mm⌀82.5×125mm
Weight (gr)485680
Filter Thread (mm)8277
Weather SealingYesYes
Zoom MethodRotary (extending)Rotary (internal)
Distance ScaleNoYes
DoF ScaleNoYes
Hood SuppliedYesYes
Hood CodeHB-86HB-23

Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 has a diameter of 89mm and a length of 85mm, making it quite compact. The lens weighs 485 grams, which is relatively lightweight, making it easier to carry around and use for extended periods. The zoom method on this lens is rotary (extending), which means the lens will physically extend when you zoom in or out.

Now, let’s move on to the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4. It has a diameter of 82.5mm and a length of 125mm, making it longer than the Z 14-30mm. It weighs 680 grams, which is noticeably heavier than the Z 14-30mm. This lens uses a rotary (internal) zoom method, so it doesn’t change its physical size when you zoom in or out.

Comparing the two, the Z 14-30mm is more compact and lighter, making it easier to carry and handle. It’s also more discreet, which can be an advantage in street or wildlife photography. On the other hand, the AF-S 16-35mm has an internal zoom mechanism, which makes it easier to weather-seal and maintain a consistent balance during shooting.

In conclusion, both lenses have their strengths and weaknesses. If portability, discreetness, and a lighter weight are more important to you, the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 might be the better choice. However, if you prioritize weather sealing and consistent balance during shooting, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 could be the way to go. Keep in mind that both lenses offer different focal ranges, so consider your shooting needs and preferences when making your decision.

Lens Mount and Barrel

The Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 features a metal lens mount, providing a durable connection to the camera body. A weather sealing gasket encircles the edge, offering protection against dust, moisture, and other elements. The lens barrel is mainly composed of plastic with some metal components, including chromed metal parts. It also has a collapsible design, making it more compact and portable. The front element system extends on a plastic tube, and the rear section, including the mount, is made of metal with a weather sealing gasket.

On the other hand, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 also has a metal lens mount, ensuring a secure and reliable connection to the camera. It includes a rubber gasket for weather sealing, safeguarding the lens from environmental factors. The lens barrel is made of plastic with a weather-resistant sealing, providing a lightweight and durable construction. However, the exterior is not metal, and over time, markings on the surface may wear off with use.

In conclusion, both lenses offer robust lens mounts with weather sealing for enhanced durability. While the 14-30mm lens has a more compact and portable design with a combination of plastic and metal components, the 16-35mm lens prioritizes a lightweight, weather-resistant plastic construction. If you are looking for a more compact option with a mix of plastic and metal materials, the 14-30mm lens would be the superior choice. However, if you prefer a lens with a lightweight, weather-resistant design, the 16-35mm lens may be more suitable for your needs.

Weather Sealing

The Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens boasts a comprehensive weather sealing, providing an impenetrable fortress against the elements. Its rubber grommet at the lens mount, combined with meticulous sealing throughout the lens’ construction, keeps dust and moisture at bay. Moreover, the fluorine coating on the front element repels dust and simplifies cleaning, making this lens a landscape photographer’s dream and an ideal choice for professionals.

On the other hand, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens features a more modest weather sealing. Its rubber gasket at the lens mount offers some degree of protection, while the solid plastic construction and weather-sealed metal lens mount create a sturdy impression. This lens can handle light splashes and dust, but it might not be as resilient as its counterpart in harsh conditions.

So, it’s clear that the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 is the superior choice in terms of weather sealing. It ensures better protection, durability, and performance in challenging environments, making it a go-to choice for photographers who demand the utmost reliability from their equipment.

While the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 can still perform well in less demanding situations, it may require extra care and protection in extreme conditions.

So, if you’re seeking a lens with unrivaled weather sealing, the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 is your champion.

Rings

The Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens features a larger zoom ring and a smaller focus ring. The zoom ring is quite substantial, taking up half of the lens, and requires a firm twist to engage.

Its markings at 14, 16, 20, 24, and 30 mm provide clear guidance, while the shorter throw allows for quick and efficient zoom adjustments.

The focus ring, on the other hand, is versatile and can be programmed for aperture, exposure compensation, or ISO adjustments. It is sleek and smooth, enabling fingertip precision. However, it lacks inscriptions, tactile bevels, and distance scales, which could be a drawback for some photographers.

In contrast, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens also has a zoom ring and a focus ring, but their design and feel are different. The zoom ring is situated near the camera body and glides effortlessly through a quarter of a turn.

The focus ring is towards the front of the lens and features ridged rubber coatings for enhanced grip. Though the focus ring has a limited 50-degree rotation, it is sufficient for accurate focusing at the longer end.

A recessed distance scale is present, but the lack of depth-of-field markings is noticeable. It’s worth noting that some copies of the lens may exhibit play between the focus ring and internal gears, which could potentially impact its performance.

In my opinion, Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens offers a superior ring design. Its larger zoom ring and programmable focus ring provide versatility and efficiency, while the sleek design enhances handling.

The Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens does offer a good grip with its ridged rubber coatings, but the potential play between the focus ring and internal gears could be a concern.

Therefore, if you’re seeking a lens with excellent ergonomics and precise control, the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens takes the crown in this comparison.

Switches

When examining the switches of the Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 S and the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR lenses, it’s essential to consider their functions and accessibility.

The Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens sports a conveniently placed AF/MF switch at its base, allowing photographers to effortlessly toggle between autofocus and manual focus modes. This minimalistic design promotes simplicity and ease of use, catering to photographers who desire quick and efficient focus control.

In contrast, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens features two slider switches located behind the focusing ring on the lens barrel. The top switch is used to control the focus mode, while the lower switch is utilized to enable or disable the VR II stabilization feature. This design provides photographers with added functionality, allowing them to manage focus and stabilization independently.

So it is clear that the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens offers a superior switch design, granting photographers more control over their lens settings. While the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens has a simplistic and user-friendly approach, the additional stabilization switch in the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens gives it an edge, making it a more versatile option for photographers seeking greater adaptability in various shooting scenarios.

Filter Thread

The Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens features a non-rotating 82mm filter thread, which is surrounded by an inscription displaying the lens name and parameters. This filter thread size is quite convenient for landscape photography enthusiasts, as it easily accommodates polarizers and ND filters without requiring a specialized filter holder. This is an attractive feature for travelers and landscape photographers alike.

The recommended protective filter for this lens is the Hoya multicoated HD3 UV filter, which offers superior toughness and dirt and fingerprint resistance.

In contrast, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens comes equipped with a 77mm filter thread, which is also suitable for landscape photography. The filter thread is made of lightweight plastic and can bounce back if the lens is dropped.

The 77mm size is user-friendly and compatible with common filters like ND, IR, and CPL filters. To protect the lens and enhance image quality, it is advised to use high-quality filters, such as the Hoya multicoated HD3 UV.

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 S lens boasts a superior filter thread, as it offers greater ease of use and compatibility with filters without the need for a specialized holder. Although the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR lens also provides an excellent filter thread size, the added convenience of the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens makes it a more appealing option for photographers who frequently use filters in their work.

Focusing and Optical Stabilization

Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 SNikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR
AutofocusYesYes
AF MotorStepper motorSilent Wave Motor
Min Focus Distance0.28m0.28m
Full-Time Manual FocusYesYes
Focus MethodInternalInternal

Focusing Performance

The Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens boasts a quick and quiet autofocus system that offers remarkable accuracy and precision, with virtually no noise during focusing. The focusing speed is rapid, taking around 0.2 seconds to focus from infinity to 0.26m, and the autofocus acquisition speed is equally impressive at just 0.3 seconds.

This lens performs well in low-light situations and offers manual focus override with entirely electronic manual focus action. However, a slight delay in responsiveness may be noticed when manually focusing. The focusing ring turns through 55 degrees, providing a good grip without any zoom creep.

On the other hand, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens features a fast, accurate, and very quiet autofocus system powered by a Silent Wave Motor (SWM). It can also focus effectively in low-light conditions and offers manual focus override for greater control. The focusing speed is excellent, taking only 0.5 seconds to transition from close to infinity.

The manual focus action is smooth and well-damped. However, there may be some play between the focus ring and internal gears in some copies of the lens, and it may produce audible clacks and some snaring sounds when focusing, although VR-operation remains quiet.

In conclusion, while both lenses offer outstanding focusing performance, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 S is superior due to its faster autofocus acquisition speed, near-silent operation, and better low-light performance.

The Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR also provides excellent focusing performance, but some minor drawbacks, such as audible focusing sounds, make the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 the more desirable choice for photographers seeking the best in focusing performance.

Optical Stabilization

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 S and Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR lenses exhibit differences in their optical stabilization features, which can impact their performance in certain situations.

The Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens does not offer built-in optical stabilization. However, Nikon Z camera bodies provide built-in sensor-shift stabilization over 5 axes, along with an optional electronic stabilization option in video mode. When used with a Tamron lens that has built-in optical image stabilization (pitch and yaw), the Nikon Z body’s stabilization system only provides roll correction, not the full 5 axes.

In contrast, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens features a Vibration Reduction (VR) II system that Nikon claims can offer an advantage of up to 4 stops. In field tests, photographers achieved up to 3 stops longer shutter times at the long end and up to 2 stops at the short end of the focal range with a steady subject.

Although VR increases shutter delay in daylight, it allows hand-holding at least 1.5 stops slower than the focal length would typically permit. The VR operation is quiet, with a switch for toggling it on or off. The lens has only one mode of stabilization and produces no noise when using VR.

Given the differences, the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR has superior optical stabilization due to its built-in Vibration Reduction II system, which offers more flexibility in low-light conditions and helps achieve sharper images.

While the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 relies on the camera body’s stabilization features, the 16-35mm f/4 provides an additional advantage with its lens-based stabilization, making it a more appealing option for photographers who prioritize stabilization.

Image Quality

Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 SNikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR
Special Elements4 ED and 4 aspherical elements + Nano Crystal Coattwo ED glass elements, three aspherical lenses and Nano Crystal Coat
Diaphragm Blades79

Aberration

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 S and Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR lenses differ in their aberration handling, which can affect image quality under specific conditions.

The Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens benefits from strong chromatic aberration correction thanks to its 4 ED glass elements, and it displays minimal longitudinal chromatic aberration in out-of-focus areas. However, lateral chromatic aberration is visible, mainly at the frame edges, especially at the 14mm focal length and wider apertures.

While spherochromatism is present, it remains minimal, and spherical aberration is noticeable at the maximum focal length and in certain scenarios, such as close-range photography. Nonetheless, the substantial depth of field makes it difficult to detect in most real-world situations.

Night shots may exhibit coma, haloing, and color aberrations when rendering point-light sources, but these issues do not significantly compromise the lens’s performance.

In contrast, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens demonstrates excellent chromatic aberration control, with virtually no signs of lateral chromatic aberrations. This minor defect is hardly detectable when shooting in raw format, and modern Nikon digital SLR bodies can automatically correct it for JPEG images. Furthermore, the lens exhibits minimal coma and spherical aberration, resulting in exceptional optical performance and limited aberrations.

In summary, the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR outperforms its counterpart in aberration control, expertly managing chromatic, spherical, and coma aberrations. This lens is more likely to consistently deliver sharp and clean images across a variety of shooting situations, making it a preferred choice for photographers who prioritize minimal aberration in their photos.

Sharpness

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 S and Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR lenses display different levels of sharpness, which is an essential aspect of image quality.

The Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens provides outstanding overall sharpness at all focal lengths. The center is sharpest at f/4 and f/5.6, while the corners excel at f/5.6 and f/8. Sharpness slightly decreases at f/11 and further at f/16 but remains acceptable across the aperture range.

When zoomed in at 14mm, the corners are weakest when wide open, but they improve even at 16mm, with center and midframe sharpness remaining consistent. At 14mm, the corners never achieve exceptional performance, and the lens fails to match the sharpness of Nikon’s 14-24mm f/2.8 lens, particularly in the corners.

On the other hand, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens demonstrates good to excellent sharpness, with some softness at the edges when using wider apertures. Center sharpness is generally satisfactory, with the sharpest aperture varying slightly depending on the focal length. At 16mm, the center is quite sharp when wide open, and it reaches peak sharpness at f/5.6.

Corners are softer wide open but improve when stopped down. At 35mm, both borders and corners display good resolution, with stopping down not significantly increasing sharpness. The lens achieves peak sharpness at f/8 or f/11, with some contrast loss at f/22.

In conclusion, while both lenses deliver good sharpness, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 S offers superior overall sharpness, particularly in the center and midframe.

However, the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR performs better at 35mm and exhibits more consistent sharpness across its focal range.

Bokeh Quality

The Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 S and Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR lenses have different bokeh qualities, which can impact the aesthetic appeal of out-of-focus areas in photographs.

The Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens can create attractive shallow depth of field effects, with smooth out-of-focus areas and a pleasing natural drop-off at f/4. However, due to its slow and wide nature, it is challenging to achieve out-of-focus backgrounds with this lens. Furthermore, significant background separation is limited unless the lens is zoomed in and shot at f/4. In general, bokeh quality is not a strong suit of the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens.

In contrast, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens features a 9-segment diaphragm with rounded blades, which contributes to pleasing bokeh. Although achieving a substantially out-of-focus background is rare with an ultra-wide to wide zoom, the bokeh is excellent when it occurs.

In conclusion, while both lenses are not primarily designed for achieving prominent bokeh, the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR holds a slight advantage in bokeh quality thanks to its 9-segment diaphragm with rounded blades.

However, it is essential to consider that the primary purpose of these wide-angle lenses is not to create strong bokeh, and their performance in this area may not be as crucial as in other types of lenses, such as portrait lenses.

Flare/Ghosting

When comparing the Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 S and the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR lenses in terms of flare and ghosting control, both lenses exhibit commendable performance, but with some differences.

The Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens performs exceptionally well against strong light sources, showcasing minimal flare and ghosting artifacts throughout its zoom range, from the short to the long end. This impressive ability makes it a reliable choice for photographers shooting in challenging lighting conditions where flare and ghosting might be a concern.

On the other hand, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens demonstrates good control over flare and ghosting. It requires strong backlighting, with the sun either inside or just outside the frame, to produce visible flare. While not entirely free of flare, it outperforms many other lenses in this aspect. The lens also responds well to stopping down and exhibits minimal diffraction effects at f/16 and f/22. Although its performance is solid, it doesn’t particularly stand out in any specific area.

In conclusion, the Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 S lens has a slight edge over the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR in terms of flare and ghosting control. Its exceptional performance against strong light sources makes it an ideal choice for photographers who frequently shoot in challenging lighting situations and require optimal flare and ghosting control.

Vignetting

Comparing the Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 S and the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR lenses in terms of vignetting, both lenses display some degree of this effect, with varying characteristics and intensity.

The Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens exhibits noticeable vignetting, particularly at the 14mm focal length and wide open aperture. However, stopping down to f/5.6 or f/8 can effectively reduce this issue. Interestingly, the effect almost completely disappears when the focal length is set to 16mm. To further improve results, in-camera corrections can be enabled, and post-processing software can be used to correct vignetting. Additionally, employing certain filter systems can help reduce or even eliminate the issue altogether.

On the other hand, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens shows less obvious vignetting in open-aperture shots across all focal length settings. However, at 16mm, the vignetting is quite strong, despite the center performance remaining quite good even at maximum aperture. Closing the aperture by one or two stops can easily resolve this issue.

In conclusion, the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR lens offers a slightly better performance in terms of vignetting control compared to the Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 S lens. The former’s vignetting is less noticeable overall and can be easily mitigated by adjusting the aperture.

Distortion

The Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 lens exhibits significant distortion, particularly at the 14mm focal length, where it reaches almost 8% barrel distortion. This distortion remains noticeable throughout the entire zoom range. However, the lens manages pincushion or barrel distortion at the frame edges quite well, maintaining straight vertical lines without the typical curvature. While software like Adobe Lightroom and Nikon Capture NX-D can mask this distortion, it remains an inherent characteristic of the lens.

Conversely, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 lens shows noticeable barrel distortion at 16mm (5.7%), which can be easily corrected in post-processing using tools like Lightroom and Photoshop. Distortion decreases as you zoom in, with the lens becoming distortion-free at 24mm.

Nonetheless, pincushion distortion becomes apparent as you continue zooming towards 35mm, exhibiting around 1.3% distortion. Nikon SLRs offer in-camera distortion control for JPGs, but correcting wide-end barrel distortion might crop your composition’s edges. Shooting in Raw format allows for one-click distortion correction or less extreme adjustments while preserving edge details.

In conclusion, the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm F4G ED VR lens demonstrates superior distortion control compared to the Nikon NIKKOR Z 14-30mm F4 S lens. The former displays less distortion overall and offers more manageable correction in post-processing or through in-camera adjustments.

Final Verdict

If you’re looking for a compact, lightweight, and durable lens with excellent sharpness, minimal flare, and ghosting, the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 is a great choice. It also has a superior filter thread, making it more convenient for photographers who frequently use filters. However, bear in mind that it relies on the camera body’s stabilization and has a weaker performance in terms of vignetting and distortion control.

On the other hand, if you need a lens with more consistent sharpness across its focal range, better aberration control, and superior distortion and vignetting control, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 would be a better choice. Additionally, it has lens-based stabilization and offers more control over lens settings with its switch design. However, it’s slightly larger and heavier than the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4.

For landscape photography, both lenses have their merits, but the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 might be a slightly better choice due to its wider focal range and exceptional sharpness, especially in the center and midframe. The wider focal range allows for capturing more expansive scenes and adding drama to your landscape shots. Additionally, its excellent flare and ghosting control make it ideal for shooting in challenging lighting situations that are often encountered in landscape photography.

That being said, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 also performs well in landscape photography, with more consistent sharpness across its focal range and superior distortion and vignetting control. It also offers lens-based stabilization, which could be an advantage in certain situations.

Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities and camera system. If you use a mirrorless camera and value a wider focal range, go for the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4. However, if you use a DSLR and prioritize consistent performance and better distortion control, the Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 might be a better fit.

Meet the Author


Wei Mao

Wei was a cruise photographer who worked at Disney Cruise Line. He is a lucky traveler who has been to more than 20 countries with his camera while working on an around-the-world cruise. Photography has changed his view of the world forever. Now he wants more people to benefit from photography through his blog.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *